In a clip that’s rapidly gone viral among both left-leaning critics of neoliberalism and right-wing populists, a young Chinese TikTok influencer delivers a searing indictment of American economic decline. Fluent in English and confident in tone, the speaker lays bare what many struggling Americans already feel: that they’ve been conned by their own elites.
“They robbed you blind and you thank them for it. That’s a tragedy. That’s a scam,” the young man declares, addressing the American people directly.
The video, played and discussed on Judging Freedom with Judge Andrew Napolitano and Professor John Mearsheimer, has sparked praise—and suspicion. While the message resonates with a growing number of Americans disillusioned by the bipartisan political establishment, some are asking: Who is behind this message?
A Sharp Critique of American Oligarchy
In his 90-second monologue, the influencer claims U.S. oligarchs offshored manufacturing to China for profit—not diplomacy—gutting the middle class, crashing the working class, and leaving Americans with stagnating wages, unaffordable healthcare, mass addiction, and what he calls “flag-waving poverty made in China.” Meanwhile, he says, China reinvested its profits into its people, raising living standards and building infrastructure.
“What did your oligarchs do? They bought yachts, private jets, and mansions… You get stagnated wages, crippling healthcare costs, cheap dopamine, debt, and flag-waving poverty made in China.”
He ends with a provocative call: “You don’t need another tariff. You need to wake up… You need a revolution.”
It’s a blistering populist critique—and one that finds unexpected agreement from Mearsheimer, who said on the show, “I basically agree with him. I think he’s correct.”
A Message That Cuts Across Party Lines
The critique echoes themes found in Donald Trump’s early campaign rhetoric, as well as long-standing leftist arguments about neoliberal betrayal, corporate offshoring, and elite impunity. It’s the kind of message that unites the American underclass in its many forms—service workers, laid-off factory employees, disillusioned veterans, and student debtors alike.
Mearsheimer went on to argue that the U.S. national security establishment itself was compromised—that its consultants and former officials had deep financial ties to China, making them unwilling to confront the geopolitical risks of China’s rise. According to him, elites were more invested in their own gain than in the national interest.
But that raises an even more complicated question.
Is This an Authentic Voice—or a CCP Production?
The most provocative—and potentially overlooked—aspect of this story is the medium itself: TikTok, which is owned by ByteDance, a company under heavy scrutiny for its ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Could this slick, emotionally resonant video be part of a broader soft-power campaign?
The Chinese government has invested heavily in media operations that shape global narratives. While the content of the message may be factually accurate or emotionally true for many Americans, it’s not hard to imagine the CCP welcoming—if not engineering—videos that sow further division and distrust within the United States.
The video’s flawless production, powerful rhetoric, and clever framing—presenting China as the responsible partner and the U.S. as self-destructive—align closely with Beijing’s global messaging. Add to this the timing, with U.S.-China tensions running high over tariffs, Taiwan, and global power shifts, and the question becomes unavoidable:
Is this sincere grassroots criticism… or a polished psychological operation?
The answer may be both. It’s entirely possible that the young man believes everything he’s saying. But it’s also likely that content like this is algorithmically favored—or even quietly encouraged—by a platform closely tied to a government with every incentive to highlight American decline.
Weaponized Truth?
This is not a new tactic. During the Cold War, both the U.S. and the USSR employed truth-tellers and defectors to criticize their adversaries. But in today's digital landscape, the boundaries between propaganda, whistleblowing, and legitimate dissent are more porous than ever.
The Higher Education Inquirer has reported extensively on how American elites—across both political parties—have betrayed working people, including within the halls of higher education. That doesn’t mean we should ignore where a message comes from, or what strategic purpose it might serve.
The danger is not just foreign interference. The greater danger may be that such foreign-origin messages ring so true for so many Americans.
A Closing Thought: Listen Carefully, Then Ask Why
The influencer says:
“You let the oligarchs feed your lies while they made you fat, poor, and addicted… I don’t think you need another tariff. You need to wake up.”
He’s not wrong to say Americans have been exploited. But if the message is being boosted by a rival authoritarian state, it’s worth asking why.
America’s problems are real. Its discontent is justified. But as in all revolutions, the question is not only what we’re overthrowing—but what might take its place.
Sources:
Judging Freedom – Judge Andrew Napolitano and Professor John Mearsheimer
TikTok (ByteDance) ownership and CCP ties – Reuters, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal
The Higher Education Inquirer archives on student debt, adjunct labor, and corporate-academic complicity
Pew Research Center – Views of China, U.S. Public Opinion
Congressional hearings on TikTok and national security, 2023–2024
I mean, he's not wrong, it's like saying that June 2025 Los Angeles protests are a Pro-CPC Psyop, same way for most Anti-ICE protests. I mean, yeah, we can surely say that most the West (including the US, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Israel, Gulf Monarchies, Turkey Egypt, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan etc) are indeed Surveillance States, Crony Democracies, and Authoritarian Liberal States.
ReplyDeleteThere's a Latino genocide happening in the US right now, so yeah, Latinos/Hispanics and people who sympatize with them have right to defend itself. Just like Palestine Action (Popular Britain Action) has right to defend itself lol. Remember that the West pardoned the ISIS/AQ Ahmed Al-Sharaa, proving the national security, public safety, anti-t3rr0rism laws, anti-extremism laws etc are bs. They're everything they claim STF and Alexandre de Moraes to be.
I get your bothsiding response on that, it's fair, yes. It remembered me about Syrians discussing on Reddit and Discord about how much the West deserves a Western World Spring (Western version of Arab Spring) and a common argument is that it would mostly be far-right and white supremacist, they're not wrong on that.
Yeah, it's fair to support a Western World Spring Movement, but the probelm is how it might takes place, because it could be far-right and white supremacist or to be like Genuine People's/Proletariat/Socialist Democracy or even something like Nyx Land's Nammu and Ahaiyuta's Kingdom of Abzu.
It reminded me of the posts calling Donald Trump and his lackies "the American Gorbachev/Yeltsin/Yakovlev/Perestroika", yeah, I still think that Elon Musk is like the American Yeltsin and Donald Trump the American Gorbachev. I remembered a post comparing the FBI, DOJ, SCOTUS etc into what the KGB, CPSU etc became during Gorbachev's era, basically depolitized and unable to do anything, since the August Coup happened when it was too late (maybe if it happened in 1989 or until the limit of 1990, maybe the USSR and the Communist Bloc would still be there until nowadays).
ReplyDeleteComparing Trump's Policy Shifts & Gorbachev's ReformsThe Decline 📉 (self.InflectionPointUSA)
ReplyDeletesubmitted 1 month ago by yogthos
Gorbachev Introduced glasnost and perestroika to reform the Soviet system. These policies inadvertently eroded the ideological and institutional foundations of the USSR, accelerating its collapse. His policies of liberalization unleashed an economic chaos that the Soviet system was not able to contain.
Today, Trump is pursuing a similar, if ideologically inverted, disruption of the US institutions. Attacking the deep state, undermining trust in media and elections, and prioritizing loyalty over expertise. He’s enacting a purge of the permanent bureaucracy under the guise of draining the swamp, feeding off polarization and institutional distrust. These policies erode the very stability of the system paving the way to an unravelling akin to that of the USSR.
Gorbachev inherited a stagnant economy that he attempted to fix using market reforms with perestroika. These reforms took form of a shock therapy with sudden price liberalization, fiscal austerity, and privatization. An economic collapse followed as a result of hyperinflation, economic instability, and the rise of an oligarchic class. Similarly, Trump is busy slashing regulations and cutting corporate taxes, fuelling short-term growth that deepens wealth inequality and corporate consolidation. Like Gorbachev, he’s ushering in a polarized economic landscape where faith in the system is rapidly dwindling among the public.
The economic unravelling of USSR revived nationalist movements, particularly in the Baltics and Ukraine, that undermined the unifying ideology. Similarly, amplified nationalism, in form of MAGA, is deepening cultural and regional divides in the US. Trump’s rhetoric is rooted in divisive politics. Just as Soviet republics turned inward post-glasnost, prioritizing local grievances over collective unity, so are states like Texas, Florida, and California are increasingly talking about breaking with the union.
Gorbachev’s reforms set the stage for Yeltsin who presided over the chaotic privatization of state assets, enabling a handful of oligarchs to seize control of Russia’s oil, gas, and media empires. The shock therapy transition to capitalism led to a rapid rise of the kleptocrats. Similarly, Musk’s companies target the remaining public services and industries for privatization. SpaceX aims to replace NASA, Tesla/Boring Co. are going after infrastructure, while X is hijacking public discourse. In this way, his wealth and influence mirror Yeltsin-era oligarchs’ grip on strategic sectors. The main difference here is that Musk operates in a globalized capitalist system as opposed to the post-Soviet fire sale. Musk is actively using his platform and wealth to shape politics in his favor, and much like Russian oligarchs, he consistently prioritizes personal whims over systemic stability.
Yeltsin was sold as a democratic reformer but enabled a predatory elite. Many Russians initially saw capitalism as liberation, only to face a decade of despair as the reality of the system set in. Similarly, Musk markets himself as a visionary genius “saving humanity” with his vanity projects like Mars colonization, yet his ventures depend on public subsidies and exploitation of labor. The cult of the techno-oligarch distracts from the consolidation of power in private hands in a Yeltsin-esque bait-and-switch.
The USSR collapsed abruptly, while the US might face a slower erosion of its institutional norms. Yet both Trump and Gorbachev, despite opposing goals, represent disruptive forces that undermine the system through ideological gambles. Much as Gorbachev and Yeltsin did in their time, Trump’s norm-breaking and Musk’s oligarchic power are entrenching a new era of unaccountable elites.
Marx was right! History repeats, the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.
studio_bob
ReplyDelete•
há 5 meses
Good analysis, in my opinion. Just to add: I have commented elsewhere that, while some people continue to place their hopes in certain American institutions (the FBI, military, etc.) to rescue us from the madness, those organizations are deliberately fashioned as apolitical arms of the State. The same was true of the Soviet KGB, Party, and military, which lacked independent political agendas and identities which might have seen them confront Gorbachev (ordinarily a great and deeply desirable guarantee against instability). When the 1991 coup did happen, it was likely doomed from the start: poorly conceived, badly organized, and perhaps above all far too late; a reflection of how ill-suited and unprepared these institutions were to intervene against what was effectively a concerted and sustained effort to dismantle the state from the top down. I expect the same is true of the US. No one will come to save us from above, and if they do one day try, it will likely only accelerate the collapse.
So far, the only distinguishable potential saving grace for the US system is the courts (Congress has apparently ceded its own powers to Trump without a fight) but even those are greatly ideologically compromised and anyway depend on executive acquiescence to their rulings, lacking any independent enforcement mechanism of their own. I have serious doubts how long and how effectively they can act as a bulwark against the ongoing and rapid consolidation of power by Trump/Musk.